![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would like to apologize in advance if this topic has already been brought up, I just saw this thing and had a couple of questions. First, if this card was covered in shillac how was sgc able to authenticate it? Wouldn't the shillac pose a problem once under a microscope? Considering it would look different than a raw card not coated in a substance? Maybe its just me, but I kinda thought the shillac would prevent sgc from grading it. Maybe I'm wrong which is why i thought id seek the advice of some of you more seasoned collectors. Thanks
|
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should Andrew with the Nuns Wagner Stay or Go | Wymers Auction | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 02-19-2013 02:50 PM |
The nuns finally get paid for the T206 Wagner | henson1855 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-20-2010 07:25 PM |
Need opinion...Wagner t206-the age old question | sportfan23 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-29-2009 09:32 PM |
Multi t206 Wagner owner question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-15-2008 01:43 PM |
T206 PSA 8 Wagner Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 08-15-2006 08:55 PM |