![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Can you give me details about the card? Creases? Overall defects on the card? It's just hard to tell from the pics. I'm a big fan of grading, so personally, I would get it graded just for protection and looks alone. From the pics you posted and without knowing further details, it looks in the "4-5" range. If it has creases, that grade would most likely dip a little.
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: 1965 Topps Joe Namath RC #122 (Low-Mid Grade) | freakhappy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-03-2011 11:28 PM |
1965 " Namath" Card | Ben Yourg | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-16-2009 08:59 PM |
New postal rate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-18-2007 03:18 PM |
Is this the going rate for an E90-1 Jackson? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 01-19-2005 02:59 PM |
How does this rate... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-29-2002 07:18 PM |