 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
03-24-2013, 11:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know? While the centering seems to be the main issue, It looks to be a fairly solid card. I have to respectfully disagree about using PSA and having them put the O/C qualifier on it. Anybody with any sense at all can see that the card is o/c, so I see no reason to have PSA label it as such. The o/c qualifier puts a "Black mark" on cards that puts a psycological thought in peoples heads that the card is of less quality than even another card that has similar centering.
I think the card would be much more attractive in an SGC holder without the stigma of any o/c qualfier. Just my 2 cents worth. Nice Card John 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: 1965 Topps Joe Namath RC #122 (Low-Mid Grade) | freakhappy | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-03-2011 11:28 PM |
| 1965 " Namath" Card | Ben Yourg | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-16-2009 08:59 PM |
| New postal rate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-18-2007 03:18 PM |
| Is this the going rate for an E90-1 Jackson? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 01-19-2005 02:59 PM |
| How does this rate... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-29-2002 07:18 PM |
Threaded Mode