 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9
03-18-2013, 04:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
In the current Goodwin auction there is a T206 card labeled Authentic that looks VG-EX or better. Excellent visual appeal. I also saw an example above of a Lajoie portrait that looks EX+.
So what is the lesser evil, a little trim job or recoloring, or a beater with a crease running down the middle, or rounded corners (which I always avoid whenever possible)? In this scenario, it doesn't make any sense if you weigh the pro's and con's of the card objectively, that the beater carries a higher demand over a barely noticable altered card. Just doesn't make any sense to a cardboard collector to pick the beater. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help Valuing a T206 - Frank Smith Chicago/Boston Card | gregstarling | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 01-24-2013 08:49 PM |
| WTB T3 with Ad Back in Poor/Fair/Authentic Condition | 25801wv | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 10-25-2012 05:56 PM |
| poor versus authentic | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-23-2012 08:38 PM |
| Help ID'ing and Valuing This Babe Ruth Photo | bcookie | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 08-30-2011 08:47 AM |
| Authentic/Altered vs Authentic/Beaten Cards | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 03-20-2010 10:17 PM |
Threaded Mode