 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
03-17-2013, 09:13 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I would like to study it in person Todd. Please do bring it to the National if you can remember to. What I proposing as a possibility is that the gloss AND the number might have been missed in the regular production process. It's just a thought and one that might make sense. I know we have seen steps of production missed in other cards. These E195s never got cut....
And I should add, after looking at the original card more, it does look to be different colored where the number should have been. That is not usually a good sign.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 03-17-2013 at 09:40 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A strange card! | bh3443 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 07-31-2011 09:49 AM |
| Strange 1975 Topps error card question | RobertGT | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-11-2009 05:39 AM |
| Strange 1975 Topps error card question | RobertGT | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 05-31-2009 07:51 AM |
| Strange things about the T206 110 card lot posted to ebay today | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-07-2009 05:30 PM |
| M101-6's - Any expert opinions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-02-2005 01:50 PM |
Threaded Mode