 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Where do you think the value of a T206 Wet Sheet Tranfer should be"? | |||
| Less than an example without "quality control issues." |
   
|
19 | 14.39% |
| The same as cards without the extra "markings." |
  
|
16 | 12.12% |
| A slight premium should apply; however, not raise the value dramatically. |
  
|
37 | 28.03% |
| A moderate premium should apply. They are relatively scarce and should be valued accordingly. |
  
|
19 | 14.39% |
| A significant premium should apply, given the supply of and demand for them. |
  
|
2 | 1.52% |
| I simply do not care. |
  
|
39 | 29.55% |
| Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
03-04-2013, 10:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
hopefully no one takes offense, but they have never really done anything for me. if they were actually struck or printed in error, or over-printed, that would be one thing, but simply having wet ink transferred from one wet card to another when the sheets were stacked, is not really special or desirable to me...but to each, his own.
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Wetsheet Transfers | MurrayMike78 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-28-2012 06:09 PM |
| T206 offset transfers - A change of opinion | steve B | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-12-2012 08:55 AM |
| t206 "wet transfers": your current view | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 08-29-2012 09:48 PM |
| WTB/T: T206 wet transfers | atx840 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 07-06-2011 10:49 AM |
| Informal Hall of Fame Opinion Poll | quinnsryche | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 109 | 07-15-2010 03:09 PM |
Threaded Mode