 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
11-26-2012, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Is" versus "Should Be"
Tim,
I get the descriptive (is) versus normative (should be) distinction but believe that the weight of history and tradition after 100+ years is so heavy that on most matters of opinion T206 (such as whether T213-1 and T215 are T206) will be governed by the status quo (that they are not T206). I agree that the normative question is interesting to talk about nonetheless. Of course, on questions of fact [such as whether T206 Tinker (Bat Off) exists with Piedmont 42], T206 is subject to ongoing revision and extension. Scot 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone Have a T215 Red Cross Type For Sale? | Orioles1954 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 04-13-2010 02:39 PM |
| T215 (Red Cross) issue mystery....can anyone explain ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-26-2010 07:11 PM |
| for those who asked about my 1910 and 1911 cards | ptowncoug3012 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 01-04-2010 05:26 PM |
| Ebay Auction Winner -T215 Red Cross lot | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-12-2008 04:31 PM |
| T215 Red Cross question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-29-2008 05:54 PM |
Threaded Mode