![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since only one was found so far, i do not believe it can be considered a legit back variation (right now). at the moment it's a very cool color "error", but that's it. once a second or third one surfaces, then it'll be a different story.
FWIW- i'm not taking anythign away from the Blue OM; i saw the blue old mill in person, it is legit and very cool...just not sure it can be considered a back that everyone "needs" as of yet. Last edited by MVSNYC; 09-13-2012 at 11:18 AM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 upside down backs "should they be on the back run?" | mrvster | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 41 | 03-08-2012 01:22 PM |
PSA T206 Back Registry set active | jtschantz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-14-2011 08:12 AM |
T206 Framed Back Reprint Sets - Framing Quote | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 12-07-2006 08:43 AM |
Complete or near-complete N172 player sets? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 07-06-2005 07:14 PM |
2002 T206 Cobb w/ Bazooka back vs. T206 Cobb w/ Ty Cobb back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 03-13-2002 05:40 PM |