 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
07-28-2012, 09:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Becketts guidelines for what makes a "rookie card" don't have much to do with what's actually a players first card. They don't count minor league cards or cards from sets that aren't major and national. By those guidelines I suppose the Goudey is about right.
My cynical defenition based on theirs is this- whatever card exists for a particualr player that's early enough to be called a rookie card but also common enough that dealers can hype it as being worth more and actually find some to sell. Steve B Last edited by steve B; 07-28-2012 at 09:32 PM. Reason: missed a few words 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1915 New York Yankees Player Contract with VITAL Babe Ruth tie in! | btcarfagno | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 05-27-2011 02:54 PM |
| question re: Babe Ruth photo | FourStrikes | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 05-03-2010 02:54 PM |
| 1916 Boston Store Babe Ruth Rookie? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-09-2008 06:03 PM |
| Babe Ruth 1934-1936 Batter Up Card R-318 #144 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-02-2005 07:54 AM |
| Question about a Babe Ruth card. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-25-2001 02:23 PM |
Threaded Mode