 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
06-05-2011, 11:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
sometimes the slightly trimmed/shaved cards (done to deceive) loses more % of value than a heavily trimmed card.
ie the value between a PSA-9 1933 Goudey Ruth, and a slightly trimmed version of the same card may be over $50K+ difference in value, even though the eye appeal is virtually the same. while a creased PSA-1 would only be worth 2-3X more than a creases card with a more obvious vintage trim/chop job (not done to deceive) Last edited by fkw; 06-05-2011 at 11:31 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about Trimming | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-12-2007 12:49 PM |
| Effect of Trimming | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-31-2007 03:58 AM |
| SGC Collector T206 Trimming Article | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-20-2007 01:09 PM |
| Trimming issue....lessons learned | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-02-2006 03:34 PM |
| evidence of trimming vs. cut short | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-08-2005 04:18 PM |
Threaded Mode