 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-16-2010, 09:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
SGC question
I got my latest submission back, and I'm generally happy, even though most came in a bit lower than I'd thought. 50's and 60's instead of 60's and 70's. I had one correct, 3 with tiny flaws I'd missed that look ok, 4 that were just a bit lower than I'd thought, one that didn't grade- a separate question I need to think about some. And this one. I had some pretty high hopes for this one, as it compared favorably to a couple from my first batch.
And the ones from the first group. So what did I miss? Or did I just get really lucky on my first group? Would you think I'd do much better if I sent it back for review? I'd figured it was at least as nice as the Rucker, but has better corners and centering, and the back is more white. It's for sure better than the Spencer, better corners, and no slight stain on the back. Steve B 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cracker Jack Blowout | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 4 | 01-16-2009 07:46 PM |
| PSA to SGC Crossover Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 03-14-2008 10:29 AM |
| M101-5 Blank backs all SGC graded | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 03-03-2008 05:15 PM |
| 1915 Cracker Jack low grade partial set SGC PSA Cobb Matty | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 17 | 01-11-2008 05:45 PM |
| Question about submitting N172 Old Judges to SGC | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-27-2003 10:06 PM |
Threaded Mode