 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
06-16-2010, 11:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I'm confused
I know very little about rings so I am making this post not to take issue with what anyone has said but in the hope of educating myself.
The first thing that came to mind as I read the initial post was that the Turner ring is from 1955, and the Leland's ring from 1957. So isn't this then trying to compare an apple to a banana? Being from different years, wouldn't one expect them to look different? The post responded to this question with the following statement: "By the way,although Turner's ring is a '55 and Leland's is a '57, the ring molds on the top of the ring are supposed to be 100% identical." So could someone please explain what that means, and why rings produced in different years could not legitimately vary in appearance? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modifications to Vintage Baseball Card Sets' Year(s) of Issue | bcbgcbrcb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 81 | 02-20-2010 02:48 PM |
| Run of Trader Speaks from 1-1974 to 10-1983 - Auction ends Dec.30 at 10:00 PM EST | jerrys | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 0 | 12-26-2009 01:20 PM |
| Lelands - poor customer service or not??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 12-19-2008 05:48 PM |
| Phillies Team Issue Postcards | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-02-2008 10:07 PM |
| Financial Times Feature Story on Lelands and Sports Memorabilia | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 09-18-2007 12:07 PM |
Threaded Mode