![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
How does everyone feel about using software to improve scan quality/resolution? When I scan cards in, I always make sure that any settings that would affect sharpness/color/contrast are not engaged but I have noticed that many dealers use some of the features in photo software to enhance images of their cards. How do others feel about this practice? Are some enhancements OK but others not? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1929 R316 "Kashin Publications" Babe Ruth with "MADE IN U.S.A" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-06-2022 02:27 PM |
T206 Old Mill "Single Factory Overprint" & Cobb "Red Hindu" & "Uzit | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-14-2009 06:28 PM |
John "Rowdy Jack" Joseph "Peach Pie" O'Connor ?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-17-2005 11:58 AM |
Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
Ben guessed the "1452". MW ( vaguely) guessed the "sjowall."" " | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-22-2003 06:57 PM |