 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
12-16-2006, 06:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Photographic Images: The Impact of Size on Desirability/Value
Posted By: barrysloate
You already know my response. In every other photographic category, a mammoth plate image would be the most desirable form attainable. The one hobby group that has it backwards is the baseball card crowd. The slab outrules everything else; if you can get it in a slab, it is more valuable small than large. It flies in the face of logic, but unfortunately plastic rules. I would trade a CdV for a display image any day of the week (including Sundays). 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1912 Boston Red Sox Photographic Display | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 09-30-2008 09:40 AM |
| Impact of the Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 07-17-2007 02:17 PM |
| a Wisconsin ballgame in 1912? : The Process of a Photographic Investigation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-01-2007 09:20 PM |
| Does The Auctioneer Impact The Price? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-09-2006 10:07 AM |
| Photographic Foxing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-19-2005 04:50 PM |
Threaded Mode