Deleted auction thread

[Archive]

Posted By: B.C.Daniels

If I had written it I would have signed my name to it-period! I am not the type of person or have the kind of personality that would hide behind that sort of thing. Everyone knows that!
Charlie could easily have the point of origin traced if he wanted to and stop accusing people of things before doing the research!

"An innocent man needs no defense." My wife would love to talk to his wife about calling my house in a tirade at 10:40pm late last night threatening me-which he did! He can take that to anyone he wants! It's logged in my phone I specifically told him one day prior that the phone was being used by my daughter. this was expressed through e-mail when he was pretending to be nice and wanted to "talk" (because he wouldn't write about this stuff)several times two days ago. Gee,given all the slams he wrote about me why the "plesantries" via several e-mails to "talk"?
I will stand by my replies to his circumventing accusations that have nothing at all to do with this issue. In this issue,my charactor is of no consequence here. I am not running auctions nor am I a card "dealer".
I will stand by my comment concerning the Hollywood Park show. Charlie didn't see me as he puts it because he had no idea what I looked like at the time. I knew who he was as he made a point of telling everyone. He wanted to buy there cards as well as sell them some! There is another person who he has engaged on the chat board in a negative manner than can quote comments he made at that show.He didn't or doesn't know what they look like either unless he has formally met them since.

The Cy Young I was reffering to was NOT the mello mint e-105 in his present auction or owned by Tony,but the SGC 40*** CROFTS CANDY blue back Cy Young he purchased from Leon under privatized handle number whatever that is changed every 30 days as is all his handles are in hopes you lose track. It will be interesting to see what grade and what company holder that ends up in on the market when it is again for sale.

The personal attack on me was both baseless and uncalled for.Charlie jumped to conclusions and should now know better after what has been relayed to him through e-mails by others. I merely relayed to him privately tips on this stuff and would never have discussed it publically if not dragged into it by Charlie! using me as a public deflection for things that have no cercern or bearing on my collecting prowess. He has yet to appologize for his public blunder and his terroristic phone call.My wife is not happy about that and expressed that to the authorities.