![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Peter Spaeth
In a trial nearly all the stuff we form judgments on would be excluded for a variety of reasons, including hearsay, lack of foundation, improper opinion testimony, and so forth. Absent eyewitness testimony or admissions, the best one could probably do is build a circumstantial case with documentary evidence comparing someone's purchases to their sales. A consistent pattern of improved grades would suggest that the person is altering cards, although it would be very hard to prove and extremely difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt if it were a criminal proceeding. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
To clean or not to clean? Friendly debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 10-26-2016 02:38 PM |
*** Time to fire up the Network 54 Cabal again....d311s this time *** | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 12-01-2008 12:55 PM |
Long Time Lurker - First Time to Post ! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 12-13-2007 04:11 AM |
B18's to clean or not to clean? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-10-2005 08:59 PM |
Even old dogs get fooled from time to time | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-22-2003 04:47 PM |