![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Corey R. Shanus
I would characterize a perfectly-done erasure of a pencil mark not as an alteration but instead as a removal of an alteration, thus returning the card to its original state (and by original state I mean the state it was in upon manufacture without anything being permanently added (e.g., touchup, bleaching, paper restoration)). I think the semantics here are important because if upon the removal of the pencil mark the card is characterized as having had the original (temporary) alteration removed and being returned to its unaltered state, then no one should take issue with the card receving a numerical grade. If on the other hand the removal of the pencil mark is regarded as a subsequent alteration, some might regard the card as having undergone two alterations and thus not suitable for a numerical grade. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How do you guys feel about... | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 5 | 08-17-2007 03:22 PM |
Is it just me or does anyone else feel overwhelmed | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-26-2005 12:09 PM |
Please make me feel better | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 05-19-2005 05:50 PM |
Well If I Ever Feel the Need to Own the Best.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 04-14-2005 06:12 AM |
Do you feel like we do..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-11-2003 08:16 PM |