 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35
09-28-2005, 01:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
OJ collectors and Scott Brockelman
Posted By: Dan Gantt
As they say, it just keeps getting curioser and curioser. Why would anyone, after 1914-15, reissue a baseball card with advertising for a defunct confectioner? Certainly, the Coca-Cola reference in that time frame makes sense, but why Royer at that address if he was no longer in business? And who would just pick that name and address for inclusion on hoax cards as disparate in time frame as Old Judges and Cracker Jacks? How thoroughly odd. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Final Day for Brockelman & Luckey Auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 10-17-2008 01:05 PM |
| Brockelman & Luckey Auction at the National-Report | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-03-2008 03:25 PM |
| Brockelman & Luckey Auction at the National | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 07-29-2008 01:51 PM |
| Brockelman & Luckey Auction report | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 40 | 07-01-2008 12:50 PM |
| Lot #44 T205 Brockelman and Luckey Auction | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-14-2008 09:22 PM |
Threaded Mode