 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
01-31-2002, 07:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
here is the deal with SGC "authentic"
Posted By: Elliot
Scott, I respectfully disagree with you with regards to grading altered cards. I think people with cards that are trimmed (for example) want to know that the cards are authentic as much as people with unaltered cards. I think you summarize it quite well in your two contradictory (IMO) statements. The first...99% of this board know the difference in a real card and a dover reprint, and the second....again the principal purpose of this grading standard seems to enable the owner to validate the originality of a card . If 99% of the people know the difference (whether the card has been altered or not) why then do they need to validate the originality of the card, and if they need to validate the orginality of the card, why does it matter whether it has been trimmed or not. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| t205 Clarke SGC 50 and some other nice "t" and "e" cards for sale | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 04-13-2008 09:48 PM |
| Where is the line between a "1" and "Authentic"? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-02-2006 04:21 PM |
| The days of "a great deal" appear gone forever | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 08-18-2005 04:50 PM |
| Does a PSA grade of "miscut" or "cut too small" mean that the card is authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 03-30-2005 01:23 PM |
| GAI dropping the "authentic" grading classification | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 01-23-2005 08:31 AM |
you'll probably need it 
Threaded Mode