![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is a great looking card for the grade!!! In my opinion, the SC350-460/25 prices are similar to any other piedmont or SC. Piedmont 42s sell for a premium, but the other harder Piedmont/SC, not really. There are guys who collect specific factories, so there is a chance you may get a small premium over, say, piedmont 350…but I think the premium would be minimal. Just my opinion. It’s an incredibly nice looking card. I’d price it at a premium just because it looks nicer than most other ‘3s’.
Last edited by stutor; 04-27-2025 at 12:02 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Back Rarity- Cost multiplier | Metsfan0507 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-31-2025 11:18 PM |
T206 Sweet Caporal Fact 649 overprint : no HOF multiplier | BBB | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-23-2016 09:04 PM |
T206 HOF Back Multiplier: Middleground? | BBB | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-29-2015 08:20 PM |
rare back multiplier | darwinbulldog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-13-2014 02:06 PM |
T206 back variations: price multiplier and scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-13-2006 08:51 PM |