![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I know it is difficult to generalize given pretty large variations in populations and scarcity across different cards and years, but I'll try to make a blanket statement anyway...
If you're buying for a personal collection, the 3, 6, and 8 grades seem to have the best bang for the buck in terms of the incremental benefits in the overall look of the card. A 3 usually looks a lot better than a 2, but seems to be a lot cheaper than a 4. The quality jumps markedly from a 5 to a 6, but the price doesn't seem to. And an 8 usually looks darn good to the naked eye and is often a fraction of the cost of a 9 (or of course a 10). Any thoughts? Last edited by bk400; 08-03-2023 at 09:24 AM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Printing More Money vs. High Card Prices | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 02-24-2021 01:13 PM |
Best Ruth card for the money | baez578 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 06-17-2013 05:18 PM |
O/T:For all of you who doubt me paying the card dealers I owe money to!!! | Zone91 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 93 | 05-09-2013 07:52 PM |
Pretty good money for a trimmed card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-10-2007 09:34 PM |
Buy It Now (I Would If I Had The Money Or Needed The Card) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-16-2005 02:53 PM |