 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
01-27-2022, 04:06 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I sent them around 60 cards back in the early beginning, mainly because of the lesser wait time & reasonable pricing. I also wanted to see how a new Company would fare.
I definitely feel they were TOUGHER on Centering than any of the established graders, and feel many of my cards were, if anything, UNDERGRADED! I believe several of my cards stand a good chance of an upgrade if resubmitted to PSA or SGC!
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What is your option on this ball? | Rookiemonster | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 02-21-2018 08:16 AM |
| Yet another option | mjkm90 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 09-16-2017 04:36 PM |
| REA search option | GaryPassamonte | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 09-25-2016 12:35 PM |
| ever wish grading companies had an un-slab option? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-14-2008 03:58 PM |
| reflections on on-site grading (not real impressed w/it) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 02-12-2003 07:05 AM |
Threaded Mode