 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3
12-22-2021, 04:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Yep the 15-20x premium for all Pafkos has never made sense to me either. I guess the mystique and notoriety it gained from being tough in high grade filtered down to all of them.
I agree with Ted that it wouldn't be a common, but I don't think it should command more than maybe triple the typical low # common in low-mid grade. And it actually used to be even more expensive (relative to the rest of the set) in mid grade. While Mickey, Willie, Jackie, and other notable '52s have obviously gone to the moon, a PSA 4 Pafko cost about the same today as it did a dozen years ago 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: 1952 Topps low numbers | jasonc | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 03-13-2021 11:56 AM |
| FS: 1952 Topps PSA 6 Low Numbers | 1952boyntoncollector | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-16-2020 07:23 AM |
| FS: 1952 Topps Hi Numbers PSA 7 | jtschantz | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-20-2018 11:49 PM |
| F/S : 1952 Topps low numbers | doug.goodman | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 10-10-2012 09:49 PM |
| 1952-1964 Topps HOFers and 1952 Topps High Numbers *NEW ADDITIONS--PRICES REDUCED* | poorlydrawncat | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 07-22-2012 12:44 PM |
Threaded Mode