NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Postwar Sportscard Forums > Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 04-12-2020, 06:09 PM
AGuinness's Avatar
AGuinness AGuinness is offline
Garth Guibord
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,019
Default 1959 Topps Haywood variation question

I just received a card I bought via eBay: a PSA 5 1959 Topps Haywood Sullivan 'no circle, U.S.A' card (no circle on the copyright, no period after 'A') variation. I took a close look, and it looked to me like there was a very light period after the 'A,' however.
I couldn't tell from the listing this light period was there, and it there was nothing wrong with the photo on the listing. It looked like there was no period.
Attached are two photos I took, one of the lower back or the card and a look with my loupe close up on the punctuation in question.
Does anyone know if this light/faded/faint period is typical for this variation, or if some shenanigans are going on?
Side note: I bought an example of the other variation (no circle, but with the period after the 'A') from COMC last fall. When it arrived, it looked like it had a faint circle around the copyright and I sent it back. Is it possible that these "variations" aren't really a lack of these marks, but just very lightly printed? I typically think that a variation that notes it doesn't have something should, you know, not have it. :P
Thanks for the help!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Haywood back.jpg (80.0 KB, 108 views)
File Type: jpg Haywood no. detail.jpg (62.7 KB, 107 views)
Reply With Quote
 



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1959 Topps -- New Variation? JUrsaner Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 24 11-19-2019 12:13 PM
Question about color variation on 1955 Topps Roberto Clemente luciobar1980 Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 2 05-25-2019 02:37 PM
1959 Topps Dolan Nichols Variation Pair Wite3 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 03-08-2014 03:35 PM
1959 Topps Dodgers Team variation 4reals Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 11 01-24-2014 02:08 PM
FS-Redsox 1978 Letter From Haywood Sullivan daves_resale_shop Autographs & Game Used B/S/T 2 11-30-2013 11:44 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 AM.


ebay GSB