![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No rational court would ever force PSA to include other grading company cards in its’ registry. If they did someone could start a new grading company, grade easier, and completely destroy PSA’s registry. Oh wait, doesn’t that company exist already?
Barry, I would bet that very few registry set participants pay a big premium for a half grade improvement thinking they are getting a noticeably better card. They are simply trying to improve their ranking on the registry. The registry is the engine that runs this all, amazingly enough the actual cards in a lot of cases are secondary. This thread is kind of like the billable hours equivalent of “The Pill Versus the Springhill Mine Disaster” by Richard Brautigan.....so many billable hours lost. Last edited by oldjudge; 05-24-2019 at 04:42 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need advice on crossover / re-grading | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-18-2017 06:43 PM |
Starx Cards - Grading - Crossover? | toledo_mudhen | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 07-04-2014 03:39 AM |
T201...To crossover or not crossover | drmondobueno | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-19-2012 10:14 AM |
Sgc crossover | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-27-2008 07:39 AM |
Crossover value? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-04-2004 08:49 AM |