 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24
10-07-2016, 02:04 AM
|
||||
|
||||
No.
Offhand, I can't think of an 1800s baseball paper photo that wasn't originally mounted. There are 'skinned' and remounted photos, but those are rare. Culver put original prints on manilla mounts years later, but those are 1900s photos. For the record, if the Delehanty is indeed mounted (I can't tell for sure from the pic. When I first looked at it I thought that might have been the white borders), I don't see anything errant with the mount. If it's mounted I don't know why people would say that's not an 1898 mount. Last edited by drcy; 10-07-2016 at 02:29 AM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Did I miss something?? | 53Browns | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-26-2016 12:32 PM |
| So, what did I miss? | npa589 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 34 | 01-28-2015 01:39 PM |
| UGH - how did i miss this | EvilKing00 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-26-2013 09:14 PM |
| DID I MISS SOMETHING HERE ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-05-2008 03:02 PM |
| Don't Miss This One!!!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-16-2002 11:52 AM |
Threaded Mode