 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4
01-30-2016, 02:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
No, Al. This doesn't belong on the master set list. It's a one-time printing mistake. Not a recurring defect. Otherwise, every set would need to include every blank backed card, wrong back card, every card with a missing run of ink (on front or on back), etc. Stick with the Page/Sain errors as items for the master set list. Leave this one off it.
And there are 4 or 5 known high numbers with this same printing defect, which means there should have been at least 100 (probably 200) of them. Which also suggests the survival rate of 1952 high numbers is about 10% (probably a bit lower) of those originally printed. That would suggest ... there were 18,000 Mantle RCs that were destroyed. Think those folks are bummed about that? Cheers, Patrick 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1952 Topps PSA 4 #332 Baritrome | 1952boyntoncollector | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 35 | 01-23-2016 09:53 AM |
| Oh, gee. I don't know if this is a good deal. I'm torn | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-22-2014 07:16 AM |
| 54 Topps torn edge look? | 67_Palmer | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 06-07-2013 07:57 AM |
| Walter Johnson - Why is it torn at the top and bottom | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 02-01-2006 04:40 PM |
| Consignment Houses - I'm torn... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 02-01-2006 08:25 AM |
Threaded Mode