 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17
01-05-2016, 10:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
As always, this subject creates an interesting debate. I'm on board with both Adam's/Kevin's and Jay's definition. However, if we take the any baseball image is a card definition, we need to include the handful of baseball images that were made before 1860. These would include tintypes, ambrotypes,and salt prints. This would also includes the Knickerbocker daguerreotype, if you consider it to actually depict members of that club.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My Baseball Card Project (ever so slightly off topic) | jerseygary | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 03-22-2010 04:05 PM |
| Off topic: Fantasy Baseball | caramelcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 03-10-2010 12:31 AM |
| Jewish baseball history discussion | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 05-24-2008 03:57 PM |
| Discussion Topic: Everyday Player Versus Pitcher | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 04-25-2007 04:34 PM |
| I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 01:42 PM |
Threaded Mode