![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The card in question - Stu Miller - is a miscut card. Nothing more. Nothing less. Every card on the sheet in that same location had the same "sect II' by it. If the sheet was cut poorly enough - it shows. If it was cut as it was supposed to be - it does not.
Now the Yellow tiger - to me - that is a variation. They misprinted it originally (because the other colors in the card are correct), and then they noticed this and fixed it. Same with the Campos black star - clearly corrected. The Bakep/Herrer cards are the line between variation and print error. Hard to know for certain whether that was just a poor printing job - or whether it was an error that was caught later. I tend to lean toward print error. But I'm not the authority there. I agree with the poster above - the poor registry Herrera is a more interesting card than the Herrer. But poor registry does not make that an error either. Just a bad printing job on a sheet. Cheers, Patrick |
Tags |
1961, prooff, rare, topps, variation |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E90-1 Miller Red Sunset Variation | pkaufman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 08-26-2015 03:41 PM |
1961 Topps #405 Lou Gehrig Benched "black tooth" variation? | swarmee | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 08-01-2015 07:16 AM |
New 1961 Variation | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 08-23-2014 09:16 PM |
1961 Topps #516 checklist variation | kzgnc6 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 04-08-2010 08:59 PM |
Seeking opinions on T213-2 Lajoie variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-05-2007 03:30 PM |