![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I personally agree with you Steve, but the 58 Herrer, the 57 Bakep and 61 Fairly are all print defects too. And the 55 Sullivan too. What the hobby ultimately recognizes as a "variation" is beyond me
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another Minor 1962 Variation | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 04-05-2014 05:12 PM |
Variation/Error Collectors: Check This Out | cammb | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 9 | 03-22-2013 08:20 PM |
New Variation for Cleveland Old Judge Collectors | oldjudge | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-11-2011 05:34 AM |
1962 Post experts - Is this another variation? | frankhardy | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 12-10-2009 09:05 AM |
(fellow e97 collectors...) e97 davis grey variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-29-2005 03:10 AM |