![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Very nice Shane and Kevin. Agree with Anthony that the 71 OPC would look fine in a display and goes for a lot less money. Before getting a regular 71 pack I had bought an OPC pack by mistake.
He is also right that the 56 and 58 packs are the toughest of all. I have a Topps and Fleer run but have settled for penny packs on those two. You could likely buy a 52 pack in similar condition for less than a 56 or 58 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1953 Topps wax wrapper | t206 cubs | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 01-02-2017 07:16 PM |
OT (Slightly): '50's Topps Wax Wrapper Canvas | HRBAKER | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 7 | 04-18-2013 08:00 AM |
1964 Topps Wax Pack Wrapper | moeson | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 11-13-2011 08:34 AM |
Looking for 58 & 76 Topps, 59 Fleer Wrapper | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-15-2009 06:14 PM |
unopened pack, wrapper, and display box price guide | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 1 | 10-19-2007 10:49 AM |