Quote:
Originally Posted by barrysloate
There would certainly be utility to adding the year to the mix, so you might have:
1888-John Smith- 252-5.
That would be helpful, without the need to change the numbering system currently in use.
|
You're right that it would certainly be easier to just add the year, but about the numbering system, I just feel that it's counter-intuitive to give a number to a card that is different than the number written on the card itself. I understand why it was done, but then again, it was the OJ producers who numbered the cards in the first place, just like any other set manufacturer.
06-25-2013, 11:10 AM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode