 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8
04-29-2013, 12:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I wouldn't expect them to narrow, I'd say it's a combination of a couple factors. First, the auto on the yellow looks to be nicer than the others, has sharp contrast, and is in pen. The full batting pose is in pencil which will not hold the same kind of value. This other pose 181 has paper loss on the back and is trimmed which I would think hurt it's value. The cards are rather equal as far as rarity, but the big differences are the clarity, implement used, and damage to the item being signed. It looks like price is reflecting this too.
__________________
N300: 11/48 T206: 175/524 E95: 24/25 E106: 4/48 E210-1: Completed December 2013 R319: 43/240 Last edited by AMBST95; 04-29-2013 at 12:35 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1928 Harrington's Babe Ruth and 1933 Goudey Ruth #149 | piecesofthegame | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-04-2013 05:50 AM |
| 1933 Goudey #53 Babe Ruth vs 1934 "Canadian Goudey" WWG #28 Babe Ruth | Yaz#8 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 02-21-2012 08:31 AM |
| 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth #181 SGC 50 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-06-2008 05:51 PM |
| WTB: 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-29-2007 09:40 PM |
| WTB: 1933 Goudey Babe Ruth | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-29-2007 09:39 PM |
Threaded Mode