![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Guys, I stumbled on this auction earlier today, be it that I'm no spelling bee champ or my fat fingers typing (It's listed as Gouday) Either way does this look real. I don't think so, but I have only 12 cards in my possession, of which only one is raw. So I just don't know. I think it is probably to good to be true.... Any help. Thx
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1933-Gouday-...item4ab41eb858 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't have an answer to your question, but I do find the auction a bit funny. It says, "1933 Gouday" in the title, but "1932 Goudey" in the description. At least he got the year and brand right once
![]() |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
At first glanced, it looked good (what was I thinking????) but after further review and a little bit of coffee, I would have to say complete "reprint."
His pinky finger is cropped and I don't like the heavy creasing and even the tiny bend in the upper left corner. The Goudey card stock is like the Energizer bunny.........it takes a licking and keeps on ticking. Lovely day... Last edited by iggyman; 02-17-2012 at 02:35 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks Totally Fake to Me!
__________________
Life's Grand, Denny Walsh |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
He's thinking about sending it in to see if it's 100% authentic. I'm thinking the card is 17% authentic.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
He buys aged reprints, so I think we have the answer:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/170764035988#ht_1169wt_1182 http://www.ebay.com/itm/230726031493#ht_1099wt_1182 http://www.ebay.com/itm/230726029699#ht_1099wt_1182 http://www.ebay.com/itm/230726031099#ht_1099wt_1182 http://www.ebay.com/itm/350518141203#ht_500wt_1182
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's one for comparison that is about as banged up as mine. But his still looks kinda funny to me.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Zach, his is the safest scam on ebay: you advertise an item as something less than what it is, sell it with a return guarantee, then hope at least one buyer every now and then doesn't return it. Everyone thinks you are honest and you can repeat the scam forever.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks guys, as I stated. I didnt think it was legit, you guys confirmed it. Thx Ralph
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Notice on the back between "Goudey Gum Co." and "Boston" there is a circular spot of heavy wear.
I'd bet the word "Reprint" was there beforehand. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
110% fake, very obvious
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Indeed and the worst part about that is, is that he probably will not refund the shipping costs to whomever returns it.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2011 Standard Catalog in hand | Bob Lemke | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 09-17-2010 03:29 PM |
FS: PSA 4 DRUM --- That's right ... no typo here | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-12-2008 08:50 PM |
T200 typo or reprint??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 01-04-2005 01:23 PM |
The result of a typo | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-01-2005 08:23 PM |
This must be a typo. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-11-2003 06:31 PM |