![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am considering purchasing this card and would like to know what you all think about the 400 price tag. Although I am not a condition snob, I don't know about this one. Other than the obvious issue all else looks acceptable. What do you think it would grade and is the price fair? Thanks in advance.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can handle the centering, and other than the obvious blemish, that card is absolutely gorgeous. I'd obviously try to get it cheaper, but I'd probably be happy with it for $400..That's just me though.
Last edited by novakjr; 07-14-2011 at 09:12 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would be happy with the card if the price is right, but with that blemish on the bottom border I don't think it grades any higher than a 2. What's VCP for a 2?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I paid about $700 for a graded "EX" which is about VCP average...This card looks about "EX" w/the blemish on front...I think $400 is a decent price but $350 would really make make it a nice deal. Do some researching online and see where vg-ish ones are priced at...Here's an alternative, this card which could be had for $330: http://cgi.ebay.com/1955-Topps-Roberto-Clemente-164-PSA-2-Good-/120744947920?
pt=US_Baseball&hash=item1c1cf5b0d0#ht_500wt_969 BTW-if you like this card there is paper loss on the back... Last edited by mintacular; 07-14-2011 at 10:36 AM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think what we're calling a blemish is actually a bit of paper loss. Without the card in hand, it's hard to tell. If that is paper loss (and I believe it is), the card won't grade any higher than a 2. That's just my $.02
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Man, that's a nice 2...no creases to be seen, just paper loss small on the back....
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks to everyone for the input. There really is no paper loss on the card. There is more layering than anything else. It appears that a thumbnail caused the damage and the layer is crumpled in an acordian fashion. I don't know if the layering can be effectively smoothed without causing paper loss. I also don't know if I am willing to spend the 400 to find out. It's just that the rest of the card looks so nice I find myself tempted to roll the dice.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Personally I like the one on eBay better, and it's cheaper!
Edited to add, I have no affiliation with the eBay seller, just giving my opinion...
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs Last edited by canjond; 07-14-2011 at 04:09 PM. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do not see that card getting anything more than a 3. Here is some VCP AVG:
1- $224.83 2- $283.89 2.5- $296.46 3- $372.74 I would offer $300 and see if you could meet in the middle. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks again for all of the advice and information. This is why I visit this site. Based on your input I think I will hold off and spend the extra money to get one in better condition that I will not second guess myself for. This one was part of a deal was depending on but as with all things you get what you pay for.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For a keystone card like this I think it is better to wait a few months, maybe spend a few bucks more, and get the right card....Then again, if that blemish doesn't bother you and you are happy with the price then by all means buy it...With big cards I am very finicky about getting the right card at the right price...
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If I bought that card, I bet the excitement would wear off quickly and I would start looking for a replacement. I vote to skip it and look for a card without such a flaw.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm passing on the Clemente. I did pick this one up. It is more consistent with my modest condition requirements. It has nice eye appeal, gloss, and decent centering. The corners are a bit soft but it was within my predetermined price range. I recently sold some unopened basketball boxes I found. I sold them for a nice profit. I am reinvesting the profits in hopes of improving my baseball collection. My goal is to pick up a 55 Clemente and a 33 Goudey Ruth to accompany this Aaron. I had hoped to have the Clemente and Ruth this past weekend. Obviously the Clemente is not going to happen at the $400 price range. I have $2700 left and am hoping to obtain a Clemente in similar condition to this Aaron. If possible I would settle for a nice PSA 2 Ruth. Obviously the price of the Clemente I purchase will impact my choice of a Ruth. I hoped to accomplish this by solely using the money generated from the sale of the basketball cards. I'm not sure that is going to be possible now but I am enjoying trying. Thanks again for all of the input.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just picked up this one here. The glare is from the camera,not in the card.
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Beautiful card I'm more than a bit envious
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice centering on the Clemente!
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great example of a beautiful card!
Drew |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I paid high though, I really wanted the card. I had one a few years ago and sold it. Big mistake. Plus, they are really tough to find with any kind of decent centering.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hey Big Spender | Yankeefan51 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 119 | 06-27-2011 07:27 PM |
1955 Topps Roberto Clemente PSA 2 BIN $305 | Doug | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 3 | 09-25-2009 08:22 AM |
Nice selection of vintage singles 1950-1980 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2009 09:08 PM |
1950-1980 singles at fair prices | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-27-2008 05:20 PM |
1950-1980 singles(baseball) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-15-2008 10:08 PM |