Did this Cy Young T206 grade too low?

[SethY]

I have owned this card for a while now and the grade has always bothered me. I think it looks much nicer than a 2. Having never really been on a site dedicated to vintage, I was never willing to ask about what others think. In my opinion this card deserves a somewhat higher grade than the 2 it received. What do you think?

Happy Thanksgiving to all and enjoy the holiday season.

-Seth

[Jim VB]

It's a little off center. It's got a couple of serious creases visible on the scan. It's got softness in all corners and 3 of the four have some major problems.

I think it's a nice PSA 2, but probably an accurate grade.

[V117collector]

The card is accurately graded due having visible creases and or winkles. I would personally say the card presents it's self very well, but still a PSA 2.

[ethicsprof]

a nice 2. The reasoning for this ,presented above ,is quite cogent.
card presents well.

best,

barry

[E93]

A beautiful 2, but a 2, primarily due to the two creases (and vg corners). I don't think it would ever get a 3, but it might get a 2.5. It is definitely very nice for the technical grade.
JimB

[Bosox Blair]

Agree with the posts indicating the card is accurately graded as a 2, but presents as a very nice 2. Pre-war cards fitting that desciption are often great buys!

Cheers,
Blair