Now that it's ended.

[Archive]

Posted By: Steve

I'm not very familiar with these regardless, I say fake. What say you?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=260172973884&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=016

[Archive]

Posted By: Todd Schultz

Fake as they come. The back is not a legit TSN back, first and foremost.

[Archive]

Posted By: fkw

Reprint.......gap between the photo and the thin black line around the photo, too wide.

[Archive]

Posted By: Tim Newcomb

This seller even claimed it was original-- this is sad-- everybody loses on this one.........

When will people learn to spot that gap between the picture and the surrounding box??????

[Archive]

Posted By: Gilbert Maines

But this seller honors returns if the card is destroyed!

"I HONOR RETURNS ONLY IF IT IS SHOWN THAT THE ITEM DOES NOT MATCH THE DESCRIPTION, OR IF THE ITEM IS DESTROYED IN TRANSIT".

[Archive]

Posted By: Todd Schultz

As I look at it again, I see where it is an m101-5. M101-5s do not exist with a Sporting News back.

[Archive]

Posted By: anthony

technically it is an original card...an original reprint. he never claims it to be from 1916

[Archive]

Posted By: DaveL

or does it look like he had a shill in there early on to goose the price up?