![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MikeW
Anyone notice this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick (calleocho)
If you are going to throw some mud around ...maybe it would be a good idea to "put some energy" into it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
not sure how this rates as mudslinging. He pointed out that someone took a PSA4 Lajoie, resubmitted it and got a 5. Given PSA's recent lax grading, more power to anyone that resubmits and takes advantage of it. I just feel sorry for the people that overpay for these overgraded cards. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
i've had plenty of cards that i thought were undergraded, only to be seen in higher holders after they leave me. probably most people here have had that experience, stuff happens... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
What happened to the white chip spot on the uniform "N" in "CLEVELAND"??? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve M.
it may have been on the original scan or on the original holder and not on the card??? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul Moss
Yep, severely undergraded, and I wish that I was the one that purchased it off ebay at that price, but it was a good bump and a profitable one as well for me. As for your chip on the uniform's N, I believe that was a tiny piece of plastic flash in the holder. If you'll look at the lettering and border at the bottom of the card, you'll see that there's a chip also. If, by some dubious means, I could make chips vanish, that one would gone to the twilight zone as well. Nice try though! Kindly notice that the pink stain on the reverse is still there, and I'm sure that some of you bathing enthusiasts would have had that card in some sort of soapy solution faster than a speeding bullet. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
no way that Speaker should grade that well. It's almost missing the top boarder. The SGC grade was more accurate, but getting the best grade has officially been a game for a long time now. As evidenced by the Lajoie, it can pay off big time, especially given that PSA has lets so many overgraded and missed trimmed jobs thru. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
The Speaker is no gem, but it is totally free of any creasing or marks and with nice color. How about we call it a 3+ on a bad day, 4- on a good one, depending of course whether you're buying or selling. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Judge Dred (Fred)
There could be a couple of reasons why the Lajoie portrait card graded better (if in fact the cards are the same):
Also, I have to agree with Jay (because I don't want to get my head bitten off and I don't want to be brow beaten ![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John S
I do not believe the original poster was being negative about the seller. The seller is simply using the system to his/her advantage. People are definitely buying holders not cards. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Ted Zanidakis
John S. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bill K@sel
I don't see any mudslinging either. More power to the seller/submitter if they can get a higher grade. I "migrated" several PSA graded cards to SGC purely for asthetic purposes and on several occasions SGC graded the card higher than PSA. Examples: |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dd
Buy the card, not the holder, said the parrot. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: anthony
quan, you speak with a thick asian accent because you are asian...at least you were the last time i met with you to pick up a card...lol |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard
Although Quan is doing his best to assimilate by dyeing his hair blonde |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jay behrens
is he getting blue contact lenses too? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: MikeW
I was suprised to read I was attempting to "mudsling". I just thought it was interesting how the same card could sell for more than double 2 months later. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dan mckee
The beauty of grading. What changed about the card to make it go from a 4 to a 5? Did it improve with age? My entire collection less a few cards, is raw. Unfortunately if I ever sell, a bunch should be graded. I still don't quite get it. Someone paid in excess of $2500 for a 1958 topps card that was worth about $25. But... it had a very pretty 9 on the holder. I am sure the 9 was placed there by an expert though. I guess that is what makes the item. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
but here is one from the National~ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
4-Sale E92 Dockman Napolean Lajoie | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 11-05-2007 04:45 PM |
T207 Wiltse with Tough Napolean back F/S | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 11-03-2007 09:30 AM |
White Border T3 Napolean Lajoie | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-28-2007 07:22 PM |
106# Napolean Lajoie question! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 04-21-2005 06:02 AM |
I've Decided What I Want | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-22-2002 10:33 PM |