|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Answer to how little of a card SGC will grade
Posted By: warshawlaw
check item 1848314617 (yeah, I'm high bidder). shouldn't there be a grade of "0.5 really poor" or "0.5 part of the card"? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Answer to how little of a card SGC will grade
Posted By: warshawlaw
is to raise the issue of whether there is any real difference between a card like this one and a card that has been trimmed. If a card missing a corner that has been "nipped" off and with a chunk out of its side is gradeable, why isn't a card with a missing bottom border also gradeable as a poor condition card? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Answer to how little of a card SGC will grade
Posted By: Elliot
Here's a link: |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Answer to how little of a card SGC will grade
Posted By: Dan Mathewson
Here's my take on it... |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need a quick answer on this one - ref. stains on a card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-20-2009 07:45 PM |
Mark Haverkos Final Answer to 1930 Ruth Card Controversy | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 03-31-2007 10:26 AM |
Finally! The definitive answer on the toughest card in the T207 set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 02-28-2005 11:45 AM |
Simple answer? Send the card back to Irishhosta? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-11-2002 06:19 PM |
SGC- the answer | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-05-2002 04:54 PM |