![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Is this just a random stamp on the back of this W572? Nefarious? Thoughts? It didn't cost much from a very good hobby friend, so no big deal either way.
(It doesn't fluoresce under a blacklight, Frank W. ![]() After a quick bit of research, using Google + Net54, it does look like these stamps were done recently to deceive. I had even commented a few times in the thread but that was 14+ yrs ago... .
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 01-10-2025 at 12:26 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe Bob Lemke exposed this fraud back in the day.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have one as well. My understanding is that these were added to the backs of legit W572s in an effort to defraud (Alan Hager??). Even PSA’s website write-up on this set mentions this.
I didn’t know that the w572s themselves may not have been legit either. That concerns me that your example doesn’t fluoresce under black-light. I believe mine would fluoresce given that it’s in a PSA holder, but given that the PSA grader(s) missed the fraud entirely and graded this as a 1923 Neilson’s, I suppose all bets are off!! I bought this many years ago (already graded) before I knew of the fraud. I don’t think PSA would be all that pleased that this card (in their plastic) is floating around out there. ![]() ![]()
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate............: 180/180 (100%) Last edited by h2oya311; 01-10-2025 at 02:28 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would never have known that these are not legit. Clueless me...
__________________
James Ingram Successful net54 purchases from/trades with: Tere1071 (twice), Bocabirdman (5 times), 8thEastVB, GoldenAge50s, IronHorse2130, Kris19 (twice), G1911, dacubfan, sflayank, Smanzari, bocca001, eliminator, ejstel, lampertb, rjackson44 (twice), Jason19th, Cmvorce, CobbSpikedMe, Harliduck, donmuth, HercDriver, Huck, theshleps, horzverti, ALBB, lrush |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I bought on of these in the 1990’s. From an antique paper. When I took it to the Plymouth mi. Card show, learned it was fake. Not sure ho told me, it Bill Mastro might have been that person. Got my money back.
__________________
![]() Collecting Detroit 19th Century N172, N173, N175. N172 Detroit. Getzein, McGlone, Rooks, Wheelock, Gillligan, Kid Baldwin Error, Lady Baldwin, Conway, Deacon White Positive transactions with Joe G, Jay Miller, CTANK80, BIGFISH, MGHPRO, k. DIXON, LEON, INSIDETHEWRAPPER, GOCUBSGO32, Steve Suckow, RAINIER2004, Ben Yourg, GNAZ01, yanksrnice09, cmiz5290, Kris Sweckard (Kris19),Angyal, Chuck Tapia,Belfast1933,bcbgcbrcb,fusorcruiser, tsp06, cobbcobb13 |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
they're fake...like the cards...or just the added stamp?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They don't look stamped, appear to be printed, would like to see one in hand...bring it to the show..
Last edited by sb1; 01-12-2025 at 03:37 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
These Neilson's W572 cards have always appeared to be authentic W572 cards to me. I will assume it is just believed that the back 'printing' was added post-production, and thus causes the red flags to fly.
Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 01-12-2025 at 04:14 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hmmmm, I dunno. There are other instances of cards issued by one company being subsequently stamped on the back by another company:
Beaton's Bars - Bobby Burrell: SportsCollectorsDaily Beaaton's Dairy Products was established in 1928 several years after the 1924-25 Paterson Hockey cards. ![]()
__________________
That government governs best that governs least. Last edited by Balticfox; 01-15-2025 at 09:02 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Below is that 14 year old thread that Leon mentioned. In it a variety of experienced hobbyist chimed in, and most conclusive is the last post in the thread by Bob Lemke, who investigated and wrote a SCD article about this subject, and Bob even implicates the likely culprit behind these Neilson's W572 cards.
https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=123916 Brian |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Thanks Brian! Good to see mind isn’t failing me (yet) as I had mentioned Hager as the likely culprit (post 3).
And here’s the PSA article mentioning these forgeries: https://www.psacard.com/articles/art...ge-alternative
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate............: 180/180 (100%) Last edited by h2oya311; 01-13-2025 at 08:39 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTT 1922 Neilson's Chocolate & 1923 Willard Chocolate for vintage non sport neeeds | camaro69 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 11-06-2023 12:49 PM |
WTT 1922 Neilson's Chocolate & 1923 Willard Chocolate for vintage non sport neeeds | camaro69 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 03-23-2023 10:42 AM |
WTT 1922 Neilson's Chocolate & 1923 Willard Chocolate for my non sport neeeds | camaro69 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 01-10-2023 08:20 PM |
FS: Lot of 7 1922 V61 Neilson's Chocolate | Epps | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 5 | 01-25-2015 05:07 PM |
Neilson's Chocolate Cards (V61) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 04-06-2002 05:17 PM |