![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey there collectors. I have this 1974 Topps card of Ryan & Seaver, represented as the 1973 Strikeout Leaders. The card number in the set is #207. There is no information printed on the reverse. Anybody ever see this before? Effect on card desirability.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is a cool printing error. Most would not buy it because it is an error card. Then there are us crazy error card and player collectors who will and have paid a premium for similar cards. If for sale I would list it in the $1 auction section. I know I would place some good bids for it as will others.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will take that under advisement.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I’ve seen similar cards before, though not this particular example. They’re somewhat uncommon; however, they are typically only collected by a small portion of hobbyists. To those collectors, they’re quite desirable.
If your question is in regards to the value (premium, multiplier, etc.) these cards usually carry, it’s not tremendously significant. Cards like this do carry a premium, sure. Just not nearly the premium most sellers place on them. Star power helps, though. It opens the pool of prospective buyers up a bit. Player collectors who otherwise wouldn’t chase print errors will occasionally pick up cards like this.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra Last edited by Eric72; 06-16-2024 at 09:04 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Ditto to the auction idea.
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
With Ryan and Seaver, I could easily see it going for $50.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have a number of these types of errors. With HOFers involved and in nice condition, it would sell well on eBay; likely for more than a regular card.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 06-18-2024 at 03:44 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a pretty unique error, and the condition is great. Personally, I'd easily pay $50.
Would grading companies slab it as a missing ink variation? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there an offer of $50 here ?
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know SGC used to grade blank backs but last time I tried they refused.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 06-18-2024 at 05:52 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd have to think it over.
![]() I'd definatety pay $40, if offered. ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Originals: Back to Back, 33 Goudey Schulte card and auto | DocScoot | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 0 | 08-06-2023 10:23 AM |
2019 Net 54 T-card Set of 54 Cards - Discuss and vote! Card Back Layout | Golfcollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-05-2019 08:41 AM |
Pre War Card Blank Back vs Non Blank Back NOVICE Question | Shoeless Moe | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-07-2011 04:09 PM |
Sweet Cap back wet transfer on front of card with Sovereign back | sesop | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 06-25-2009 01:09 PM |
The One Card you wish you had back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 06-12-2007 07:57 PM |