Lets see your wrong labels

[x2drich2000]

Came across this one tonight, ugh. Lets see you're really wrong TPG labeled cards.

[bobbyw8469]

This was one I sold not too long ago on the Net54 auctions.

[Rhotchkiss]

DJ- at least they got the blue back correct.

That is a really nice 1975 Pete Rose; I always liked that he dressed up like Gary Carter

[GeoPoto]

I don't know what "Tannehill on Front" is intended to convey. Lee never played for Washington.
https://www.net54baseball.com/attach...1&d=1592650837

[itjclarke]

Lots of E121, 122, 220 mixups out there. Here’s one of mine.

[Aquarian Sports Cards]

Nice of Probstein to leave the card behind the ridge that's supposed to hold it in place...

[itjclarke]

Originally Posted by Aquarian Sports Cards

Nice of Probstein to leave the card behind the ridge that's supposed to hold it in place...

I just dropped it from a few inches and the card popped back into place. Like so many others I’ve seen, it was listed and sold as an E121, as the label states.

[bnorth]

I think this is the only one I have left. I used to have mis labeled cards from many different companies and even owned 3 PSA slabs with counterfeit cards in them.

[Ronnie73]

Here are 4 cards that I can contribute. I have a fifth one some place thats a 1984 Topps Don Mattingly PSA 8 thats listed as a Tiffany but it's a regular issue. I'm at that point where I have too much stuff and can't find anything anymore.

[BabyRuth]

These are actually 1967 Die cuts

[swarmee]

You know you can send them back to PSA and they'll fix it for free right?

Here are some I found on the internet today:
Flip turned around in holder.

This one's pretty cool. It's a PSA 7 Mint.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/1982-Donrus...cd8e%7Ciid%3A1

And then I had many fixed from mechanical errors over the years, including some N43s that were originally marked as the N29 set.
They had an awful time trying to figure out which colleges were in the T51 set when I submitted mine (getting Penn and Penn State confused, and other similarly named colleges).

[Leon]

Originally Posted by itjclarke

Lots of E121, 122, 220 mixups out there. Here’s one of mine.

The E121/122/w575-1 errors are some of my pet peeves. I have seen more mistakes in SGC and PSA slabs than BVG..

[Vintagedeputy]

These two just came back. Note the player’s names on the bottom left. They reversed the labels.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Vintagedeputy

These two just came back. Note the player’s names on the bottom left. They reversed the labels.

All 3 of the big graders routinely mess up and label T219's as T218's as well. Lots of mistakes in graded T218's out there.

[ahumes13]

8 and 3 are so close!!! And disclaimer, I love SGC, but it is what it is...

[ahumes13]

Originally Posted by Leon

The E121/122/w575-1 errors are some of my pet peeves. I have seen more mistakes in SGC and PSA slabs than BVG..

I'm actually amazed when any grading company gets these right!

[ahumes13]

These are fantastic. DJ, yours as well. Anyone with a business (I'm not a business owner personally) would understandably say there is a margin for error, and to some extent I think we all agree, but examples like this...smh

Originally Posted by Ronnie73

Here are 4 cards that I can contribute. I have a fifth one some place thats a 1984 Topps Don Mattingly PSA 8 thats listed as a Tiffany but it's a regular issue. I'm at that point where I have too much stuff and can't find anything anymore.

[Pat R]

>

[nebboy]

My miss labeled entry shows E90-1 which is the St. Louis front - should be a E106 chicago

[nebboy]

Back photo of labeled E90-1

[whaler]

1910 incorrectly labeled as a 1911. I contacted SGC, but they ignored me.