![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Everyone,
I have heard on a few occasions where some board members were able to CLEAN UP poor conditioned cards. Obviously, this card has a hole in it because it was pinned up for over 50 years, but is there anything that can done to salvage it? Is it worth trying to recondition it? Will the value of the card materially change after the CLEANING UP process, or should i just leave it as is? In the present condition, what value does a card in this condition hold? Thanks again for all the valued input. Lucky |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Clean it up, it's already altered/damaged/dirty and you can't make it worse. Plus it's kind of nauseating to look at in its present condition.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not sure if much can be done...and even so I would leave it alone. Here is a card I got from a Net54'er a few years back (thanks again Paul). Some might think the card is near death, whereas I see it as merely a flesh wound.
Nice see-through Lou. Brian |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you all for your valuable input.
The question now remains, what is the right process in soaking and cleaning up such a card? Heard about it on these boards from others that have gone through the process themselves, but kind of a leap in putting it into practice on such a card, even though the value is a fraction of what it should be because of its condition. PS. There are 2 other Ruth cards from the same set, in similar condition. Lucky. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would leave it as is. It looks like a reprint to me.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is a photo of the back of the card.
Thanks again. Lucky. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is hard to tell without a decent scan, but I agree with Michael that it may be a reprint. Even if it is real, soaking the card isn't going to make much of a difference in the appearance.
__________________
Rick McQuillan T213-2 139 down 46 to go. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ah memories! I bought a dozen or more American Caramels just like that. Somebody had evidently nailed a bunch of them to a wall and took no care with the removals.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Didn't realize it was Canadian...that'll drag the value down some. As far as cleaning it goes, before you do anything you should try and figure out what exactly the black stuff is....dirt, soot, mold? I've never seen soiling like that. Do you have a common you can test with?
__________________
Items for sale or trade here UPDATED 3-16-18 |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That was my first impression as well.
__________________
Please visit my website at http://t206.monkberry.com/index.html |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here are some other definitely authentic tack-holed damaged cards from the same batch (not all mine). These cards did not appear to have been exposed to the sun. Over the years I have seen many cards that were tacked and had fading from the sun...just not sure if the Gehrig is one of them, as the fading looks a little different. Perhaps the fading is due to 'unnatural' lighting
Brian |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Looks like BB gun practice
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All those E90-1s came from me, since the Sixties. And there's more of them out there but not in my hands anymore. I initially had forty-something of them. No Jackson or major scarce ones though. We used to call them the buckshot gang. Then I thought they were tacked onto a wall. Could also be nails. Unless someone wants to pay for forensics the mystery will remain.,,and maybe it more fun that way.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd stick it in the spokes of my bike.
![]() |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just an observation but if they were pinned up for 50 years right through the center of the card....I'm shocked the cards appear perfectly flat? Based upon the centering of the hole.... at some point the card will have a more convex appearance? (regarding the White Border T's)
Last edited by engja123; 09-21-2016 at 09:26 PM. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The original card looks to have some other kind of damage than just sun damage. Maybe a chemical or something. As to value only an auction would say ....but I could see it being several hundred dollars.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Same type of damage..maybe made to look damaged? Purposely?
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The color bleed to the back or on the fronts does not look kosher at all on those. Granted, I have zero experience handling the Canadian issue nor have I seen Canadian repros. Those however give me pause.
They certainly look chemically damaged in some way as Leon said. Are they really brittle? They look super fragile.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1933 Goudey Lou Gehrig card - REAL OR FAKE? | bobbyw8469 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 05-16-2014 03:22 PM |
1933 Goudey Lou Gehrig-SGC 1 Great card | ezez420 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 04-08-2013 05:49 AM |
Baseball card art/photo:gehrig 34 goudey or not gehrig 34 goudey.that is the question | Forever Young | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 31 | 12-20-2012 07:14 AM |
Fake '33 Goudey Lou Gehrig card on eBay | iggyman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 04-19-2010 11:15 AM |
card damaged on way to/at grading company? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-18-2008 09:15 PM |