|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
 | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  New PSA Holder Premium? 
			
			Has anyone observed a price premium with the new PSA holographic holder over the previous one? Is willingness to buy higher with the new look? Personally I think the slight change is more aesthetically appealing.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			I offer more due to the less of a chance of the holder being a fake...though someone on the board may correct me on that
		 | 
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			Less chance of a bump
		 
				__________________ "Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors | 
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			less chance of wasting money hoping for a bump...
		 | 
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I have sold numerous cards with the new holder.  I have not noticed any sort of premium bump for it.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#6  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   
			
			As a buyer, I prefer any PSA holder except from the first few years.  I would attach absolutely no premium to the newest ones.  The new holders are nice; at least PSA didn't do a stupid change as SCG a year or two ago.  Their holders from year 2000-on have been very consistent and I applaud them for that.  ---Brian Powell
		 | 
| 
			 
			#7  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|  psa holder 
			
			I have recently sold some cards with the new holder, I haven't seen any bump in price but it may have helped sell the cards.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#8  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			I don't think it matters to most people unless they suspect a holder of being fake, which with PSA is not really a problem.  I will say that I don't like their earlier ones (where the printing on the label looks almost as if it was done on a dot matrix printer; slashes through the zeroes and that kind of thing...) but other than that I generally don't pay much attention.  I do think SGC's new holders look horrible.  When I first saw some online after not being that active in the hobby for a period of time, I thought they were fakes.
		 
				__________________ Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. | 
| 
			 
			#9  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 | |||
|   Quote: 
 | 
| 
			 
			#10  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			On cards that tend to see fakes, I think it is worth a premium.
		 | 
| 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 | ||||
|   
			
			Agreed.  Some collectors feel PSA standards are tougher now and I could see them paying a premium for new holders on high end cards.
		 
				__________________ Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. | 
|  | 
| 
 | 
 | 
|  Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| SOLD 1935 R309-2 Goudey Premium Indians Team Premium | TheBig6 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-28-2014 10:58 AM | 
| New PSA Holder? | AMBST95 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-04-2013 10:20 AM | 
| WTB: 1939 Goudey Premium or 1939 World Wide Gum Premium - Joe Gordon | bcbgcbrcb | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 07-26-2012 08:59 AM | 
| New PSA Holder? | rp12367 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 07-24-2012 09:27 PM | 
| Is this just an old PSA holder? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-22-2004 04:39 PM |