![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So the attached pictures are of my Ruth barnstorming poster. It appears that a few areas of the poster are actually stuck to the glass so ive never completely removed the piece from the frame. What I did do was carefully remove one side of the frame and snapped a pic of a corner of the poster under blacklight. That picture is taken at an angle but not through any glass. The edge is seen in the picture extends past the glass. The foam behind the poster lights up bright white whereas the poster does not. Any thoughts?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Isn't that kind of bright in person? If it is, then That might not be a good sign......(
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Not much of a glow.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
But the edge of the poster doesnt "light up" like the foam board used behind the poster did. What you see really bright in the picture is the modern foam backing and not the poster. Wouldnt that be a good sign
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Strictly and only addressing the black light test picture, that is a good sign. It appears the poster as shown does not have optical brighteners (comparing it to the foam). If it fluoresced as bright as the foam backing, that would prove it modern.
An antique poster would have no optical brighteners. However, lack of optical brighteners doesn't prove it old, as not all paper modern paper has optical brighteners. The lack of optical brighteners just says that that specific quality is consistent with it being old, not proof that it is old. Antique items can and usually do have some fluorescence (they almost never show up as black under blacklight). It's just that they shouldn't fluoresce as brightly as a modern piece of computer paper or baseball card. That's why you should do the test by comparing it to something modern that fluoresces brightly, such as the foam backing. The poster's fluorescence is clearly quite a bit darker than the foam's. I often use a little shard of computer paper for comparison. Something with optical brighteners is usually obvious, as it very brightly. Last edited by drcy; 09-15-2014 at 02:36 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1929 R316 "Kashin Publications" Babe Ruth with "MADE IN U.S.A" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-06-2022 02:27 PM |
O/T: The movie "Babe Ruth Story" makes "The Greatest Bad Movies of All Time," list | WhenItWasAHobby | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-30-2013 09:16 AM |
"Black Sox" 1920 barnstorming team | Brian-Chidester | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-04-2010 10:30 AM |
Forsale VERY RARE 1929 Babe Ruth card "Babe Comes Home" | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 03-02-2006 01:06 PM |
"Lighted" Loupes and fluorescent long wave lamps~ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 02-23-2006 06:55 AM |