![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This is not meant to continue the PSA vs. SGC debate but simply as a fun (and perhaps helpful) exercise: Chose a few, or many, popular vintage issues and declare which holder they LOOK better in. We're not talking pricing issues or which company is likely to give a better grade but just (subjectively) which holder displays the card best. For example, in my view, Ramlys look much better in SGC because PSA uses a baggy. On the other hand, T207s look better in PSA because the dark color blends in too much with the dark SGC holders.
And so on. Let's see your picks and comments! |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just based on sets I've done or am working on, I feel that almost all pre-war issues tend to look better in the SGC holders. They're almost like little framed pieces of artwork. I bought a partial set of 1933 DeLongs a couple years ago, all in GAI holders, and even they looked way better than the DeLongs I had already purchased in PSA holders.
However, I do agree that darker cards such as T207s tend to look better in PSA holders. I have completed a T200 Fatima raw set and if I get it graded I will likely use PSA because of the darkness of the set. The post-war sets that I'm doing look a little better in PSA holders: 1955 Topps All-American, 1970 Kelloggs baseball and football, 1977 Topps cloth stickers, etc. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The Mayos are almost a tossup: SGC makes the dark cards look even darker but PSA uses a baggy. I avoid baggys at almost all cost.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think all red cards like Cracker Jacks look a lot better in PSA holders. T3's too, not a huge fan of the SGC over-sized holder.
Probably all black/white/sepia issues look better in SGC. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm in agreement with Jeff. That being said though any PSA slab that has their infamous baggy inside looks like $@#%.......
__________________
Tony A. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Some issues there's no great option. PSA uses baggy for Tattoo Orbits--but SGS for some reason mounts them way too low. I should add that I obtain cards mainly on aesthetic appeal.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think most cards look better in SGC, except maybe Mayo's - the black on black is a bit much and the card gets lost. JMO
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
E107's look better in SGC holder. I like Old Judges also in SGC.
__________________
Be ethical at all times. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Goudey 1933 and 1934 fine in PSA -- because of larger size, border is not so important.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
E121 cards present better in SGC holders
__________________
Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
T205's look better in SGC holders
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sgc needs to go to a white insert for dark bordered cards. Have a nice 50 Drake's that looks really crappy with the black insert. I'll bet 71 topps look bad also.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I LOVE Cracker Jack in SGC holders...no comparison!!!
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
For sale - Vintage Football cards - RAW & GRADED - Sets, Singles, Partial Sets | Shouldabeena10 | Football Cards Forum | 4 | 09-24-2012 11:02 AM |
OT: Where do I find those fuzzy holders for slabbed cards? | calvindog | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-24-2011 01:37 PM |
FS: 1972 Topps (204) Different Cards NM+ **SOLD** | Bunker | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 04-26-2011 10:03 PM |
Holders for Tobacco cards.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-15-2008 09:33 PM |
Auctions ending early to the chagrin of bidders | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 03-09-2007 06:08 PM |