![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Rick Swaine
How can a normal collector (if there is such a thing) tell a legitimate raw blank back M101-4 or M101-5 from the numerous reprints that are out there? How do the grading companies tell? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Anonymous
Hi Rick! At the top right of the page, there is a links section titled "Detecting Card Alterations and Reprints" The following article is there: |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: dynarl
Do the M101-5 have a glossy finish? I picked up 7 common cards about 12 years ago at a local auction for $6 and figured they where fake but would look good on the wall in my sports room. D. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Yes, the fronts are glossy on real ones. One of the best ways to tell if the card is a reprint is to look at the white border inside the frame on the front. If it's very large at all then it's probably a fake. After looking at a few real ones that area is fairly easy to distinguish. As pointed out our "detecting" section has a good article on how to spot the good from bad ones. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John V
Are they known to sneak past SGC? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Frank Wakefield
A black light would help. I keep mentioning this, seems like few try it. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I have never personally seen SGC grade a fake M101-4/5....Some of the fakes are pretty good though.. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: fkw
The reprints are easy to spot (unless someone has made new ones that I havent seen yet). |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|