![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim
I was shown a Ruth Fro-Joy uncut sheet on Friday and asked my opinion on whether or not it was real. I know from doing a little research that there are more fake sheets than real ones and would like to know what to look for to determine if this one is real or not. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
One of the best ways to be able to tell would be the toning of the paper. As long as it's black and white there is a chance it's real. I will guess that less than 1% are in fact real. Putting magnification to the printing would be the best way to determine if it's the correct type of mfg'ing process. You can go to our "detecting card alterations" section to see exactly what to look for. David Rudd Cycleback has some good info over there. regards |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Red
1% is way too high. The easiest way to tell is to ask the person where they got it from. All answers involving a garage sale, flea market, estate sale, local auction, local card shop, mall show, antique store, inheritance, attic, and similar type finds will be a fake and waste of time. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Good points...and thanks for reiterating what I said, which was: |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
Maybe Bush/Cheney were responsible for all those Fro Joy reprints? JUST KIDDING, REALLY. Anyway, Leon & David Rudd are correct about the printing process. The ink needs to display a dark rim as in the image below, & a microscope will be needed. I'm not aware of any reprints that were photoengraved. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
"I'm not aware of any reprints that were photoengraved." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
I've heard that story before. Not from another source, but here on Net54. If that's true, I suspect only the cards were reprinted. There just are not enough photoengraved full sheets in circulation for me to think that the sheets were reprinted with the original plates. "I'm not aware of any reprints that were photoengraved" was only intended for the sheets, & not the cards. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
Photoengraved individual Fro Joy cards are still quite rare, so that makes me question if they were reprinted with the original plates. They are not as rare as the sheets, but once again I would think there would be many more in circulation if the original plates were used at a later date. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: davidcycleback
I'm not sure, but a Fro Joy sheet might fit into the new Beckett big holder-- which, if true, could mean your friend could sent it into Beckett. They already grade Fro Joy singles. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fro Joy opinions Real or fake? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 10-24-2008 11:45 PM |
Babe Ruth 1928 Fro Joy Complete Set Real Or Fake?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 12-28-2005 04:05 AM |
Fake Fro-joy uncut sheets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-26-2004 12:57 PM |
fro joy ruth sheet - k.c. at it again! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-26-2003 01:09 AM |
Fro Joy - Fake vs. Real | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-01-2003 11:09 PM |