![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
Kirk - contact Michael or Glyn at SGC, they may be willing to work with you. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Sean
I think if the card grades lower they pay you the difference in value. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kirk
^Which would be a slap in the face considering it was their holder that devalued the card. The whole thing just makes me sad. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
...to me, to a somewhat lesser extent, with an SGC 60 T206 Walter Johnson portrait. I was pretty upset by it. They reholdered the card for free to keep the pressure of the border, but two little indentations in the edge remained. "Fortunately" it was a 60 before and after, but I would be somewhat concerned with higher end material. I think it is a rare occurrence, but obviously it has happened a few times. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: John S
Ouch! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Paul
It has happened to me too on an expensive card, but I haven't contacted SGC about it. Same type marks as in the original post. It came back from SGC that way after grading, & must have happened when they shipped my submission. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jeff S.
That Berra almost looks like it was dropped. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: quan
i've had a 2-3 cards where i felt the edge damage was caused after grading by the sgc holder. imo beckett holders are the best even if you don't agree with their grading. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kirk Rothrum
"That Berra almost looks like it was dropped." |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt Bojorquez
This has happened to about five high-grade, valuable cards of mine. In all instances, the black insert was too tight and one of its' sharp corners cut into the edge of the card. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Steve
We summize PSA slabs (without the mylar back sheet) could produce the same dings, if dropped. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kirk Rothrum
"We summize PSA slabs (without the mylar back sheet) could produce the same dings, if dropped." |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: E, Daniel
Not to run contra as I sympathize with your disquiet, but I don't think SGC or any other grader assures that a slabbed card will remain pristine forever or in exactly the same condition as when it was intombed. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kirk Rothrum
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Scott Levy
I have seen firsthand the damage that older versions of SGC slabs can (and have) done to T206 cards. I will leave it up to the board member who suffered extensive damage as to whether they would like to elaborate further. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: E, Daniel
Hey Kirk, I love the card and whether it's high dollar or not really didn't guide my response... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: smtjoy
I have had cards damaged in both SGC and PSA holders, dont like it but it does happen. The big difference is wait till you try and get PSA to do anything about it, lol, SGC will do their best to take care of it. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh
I would like to be a little bird and hear what PSA says when you tell them you think their holder damaged your card. Ha that would be funny to hear. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kirk Rothrum
Look, I'm not saying PSA is better, or that SGC sucks... I'm just seriously sad. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Todd Schultz
I am an SGC guy all the way, but I am extremely leery of slabbing anything high grade that has much value. They nicked a e254 Harry Hooper of mine, but it still got an 88 and that issue is SO thin I can see where the card could move around. They also nicked a Johnston's cookies Spahn of mine, which is not so thin. Since lately my tastes have centered on more mid-grade specimens, I'm less concerned, but I'm still hesitant to place my high grade stuff there, unless I'm ready to sell it and the slab means extra $$$. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: ali_lapoint
slabbing a card should be a way of freezing the card in time. if it is not possible to create such a holder, then i really fail to see what the purpose of a holder is. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kirk Rothrum
Thanks for all the comments! |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC holder....leaking... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 11-21-2007 04:59 PM |
New SGC Holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-03-2006 08:51 AM |
cards in old SGC holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 06-05-2005 06:57 PM |
Type card collecting...Tough issues..Really Tough issues..Part II..Cabinet Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 05-09-2005 12:54 PM |
SGC needs to do better on this holder | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-16-2001 01:56 PM |