![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bernie
Are they a solid grading company or less reputable like PRO ? Do they have a reputation for grading trimmed cards ? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cashews
do not buy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bernie
thanks |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
The have a reputation for ignoring trimming. I also wouldn't trust them on authenticity on any obscure issues. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Joann
On the other hand, it might not be all that clear. The answer may turn out to be the infamous "it depends". Here is a fairly well-rounded discussion, with points both pro and con. Certainly not all negative though. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Cashews
personally i would never ever buy a high grade CSA card. if you're looking at a CSA 7 or 8 i would 100 percent pass. if you're talking about a CSA 2 or 3 i would say its worth it to take the chance. but thats only if its not an insanely rare card. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh
Stay away. I took a chance a while back and bought some of their graded cards. None were crossed over. Came back trimmed. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matthew
I know CSA is not a good grading company. How is KSA grading compared to the better ones like sgc psa. i notice most ksa are hockey cards. i guess thats fdrom being acanadian grading company. but how are they with baseball or vintage cards. thanks guys |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jeffdrum
I echo the sentiments regarding staying away from high grade CSA cards. On the other hand, a few years agao I bought a CSA3 T227 Bender and it crossed over to an SGC 3. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Fred C
I've only purchased two CSA graded cards (at a huge discount). Both were cracked from the holders and then submitted to SGC. Both graded at least one full grade lower by SGC. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bernie
CTA Grading Experts |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: keyway
I have found that CSA graded cards in the early holders have no problems whatsoever. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve
My only two CSA stories: |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Jerry Rucker
Wasn't CSA started by Alan Hager |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave S
I have crossed many of the older god-awful-ugly blue and gold holders to SGC with no problems whatsoever. Think most of the newer report-card type holders are the ones to worry about. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
I think that was ASA... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Kevin Saucier
I've also had good luck and crossed the blue holders over with no problems. Many (most) got bumped a grade. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bruce Babcock
Hager started ASA, as Leon said. Most of the ASA I cards I bought were trimmed although others have had better experiences. In all fairness to CSA, they aren't as bad as PRO, the all-time worst, but I would be leery. Likely to be overgraded. Avoid CTA as well, if they are even still around. Either unable to detect problems or willing to overlook them. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Randy
I just bought this card online |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Matt
That depends on what your expectations were. |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Dave Haas
I've had 3 CSA graded cards over the years and all came back from both PSA and GAI as trimmed. Good luck. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Randy
Looks to be a great shape card none the less. I will inspect it when I get it in the mail next week. I am hoping for a good grade if not trimmed like a 6. CSA on their website doesnt graded altered cards. I didnt know about CSA until after I bought it. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Arthur Lobbe
Years ago I bought an M116 Walter Johnson raw in an auction. I handed it in at a show to PSA and it came back a 7. CSA was grading at the show and I gave it to them and it came back a CSA 9. About a year later I tried crossing it back to PSA and it came back an 8. A couple of months later at the SF Labor Day Show I sold/traded it for cash and a bunch a stuff. I later learned that it wound up a PSA 9. Go figure! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
Arthur- that story should be the poster child for everything that's wrong with grading. There are few objective standards, and it always makes me wonder why people pay such huge premiums for high grade cards when grading at times is such a farce. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: 1880nonsports
Barry you'se is right. Sad. Only part of grading is science - the rest is subjective. I understand why some collectors and dealers continue to submit cards until they get a grade they fancy - and if they pays their money - they should be able to submit a card as many times as they want. The grading companies are unable to determine whether a card has been submitted before - which inherently skews any kind of registry/population report - as some cards and respective holder may no longer exist - and some single card could occupy as many spaces as times it was submitted. The whole thing "feels" fundamentally wrong to me. A numerical grade as opposed to authentic/not authentic is either about transacting business where the actual condition of the card cannot be SEEN or about the # itself. For a dealer whose income depends on getting the most for his/her product - the higher the grade the greater the sale - especially in the "rarified air" of dem whales or registry masters. To resubmit a card numerous times hoping to catch someone napping at the grading company seems unprincipled - but perhaps that is the American way? Funny that about 7/8 years ago I asked one of the grading companies if I could get a card holdered with no grade, The look I got was priceless. "Why would you want to do that" and "that isn't something we do". I admit I PAY based on grades - but as it's been said befoe - buy the card and not the holder..... |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: barrysloate
In Arthur's example that M116 Johnson was a 7, 8, or 9 at different times. That is an unacceptable spread when the difference in value between a 7 and 9 can easily be 5x-10x. How can buyers have any confidence in the market, and pay such huge premiums for low pop cards, when those numbers have little objective meaning? Given the sloppiness of grading and the constant bumping for a higher grade, the spread between NR MT and Mint should be minimal. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Bottom of the Ninth
Barry, |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Arthur Lobbe
Greg, |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: JimB
"Upon retun I spotted a hairline crease on back, was it there before? hmmm PSA hmm." |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Randy
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
If you look at the whole card it's got tiny borders on top and bottom compared to other T206's. Couple that with how sharp they are AND the fact it's in the holder it's in....and I think you can come to your own conclusion. There is a tiny chance it's not trimmed....but I would rather take my chances on the lottery.... |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: T206Collector
My view is that it is trimmed along the top, at least. Measurement is less relevant than ensuring that your card was cut in the factory how T206 cards were cut. Clean T206 cards come in various shapes and sizes. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Randy
But the measurements seem to be prefect, maybe slightly larger then my other t206's. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Measurement alone will not tell you if it's trimmed or not. As for my last comment I am sure there are some T206's that are undersized and fine....but if you put all 3 of the telltale signs together... |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Al C.risafulli
From the article on detecting trimming in T206s available right here on 54: |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: leon
Nice point...sometimes I forget the work we have done on Net54....it's a great article and can be seen in full right here... |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Randy
look at http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-1911-T206-Cy-Seymour-Throwing-PSA-8-POP-3_W0QQitemZ110226585925QQihZ001QQcategoryZ31718QQr dZ1QQssPageNameZWD1VQQcmdZViewItemQQ_trksidZp1638Q 2em118Q2el1247 |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CSA grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-27-2005 09:04 AM |
What's the story with CSA? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-25-2005 04:42 PM |
Need an opinion on CSA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-25-2004 10:34 PM |
CSA vs. PRO | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-12-2004 10:18 PM |
CSA | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 03-27-2003 03:47 PM |